A note from the administrator.

I have had to close the forum to new members. Registration is shut. I'm sorry for it - but I can no longer vouch for who comes through the door.

You may also find that certain older topics are no longer where you left them. I have, with great reluctance, removed a small number of threads and posts from this forum. I did so at the written request of a firm of solicitors acting for the landowner, who hold that the material touched on matters they would prefer were not aired in public.

I have complied, because I am one man and they are not. I want it set down plainly, here, that I did so under protest, and that I do not accept the grounds. Nothing removed was untrue. Nothing removed was anyone's business to suppress.

But I will not delete this board. What is left here stays, and you may read it for as long as I can keep the lights on. I have locked the doors; I have not burned the house. I have kept copies of everything. I would ask, gently, that those of you who hold anything of your own do the same.

E. Selwood

Black Death villages - which ones round here?

Post Reply
Message
Author
young_jordan
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2016 5:00 pm

Black Death villages - which ones round here?

#1 Post by young_jordan »

me again! different project this year, the Black Death. teacher says loads of villages were wiped out by it and never came back. is that true round here? which ones? trying to find a local one i can actually go and look at rather than just Eyam which everyone in my class is doing.
wansdyke got me an A, cheers all ;) now doing history at college

E_Selwood
Posts: 38
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 2:35 am

#2 Post by E_Selwood »

Welcome back, Jordan; the As clearly agreed with you. A useful caution first, because your teacher has given you the popular version. The plague of 1348 to 1349 killed perhaps a third to a half of the population, which is staggering, but it rarely wiped a village out at a stroke and left it empty forever. What usually happened was slower: the plague weakened a place, then a run of bad harvests, then a landlord turning arable to sheep because there were too few hands to plough, and over a century the village dwindled and the last families left. So the honest answer is that very few of our deserted villages died of plague alone; most were killed by the plague and the sheep together. That is less dramatic but more true, and your teacher will respect you for the distinction.

There's a Medieval Settlement Research Group here https://medieval-settlement.com/
We retrieve what we can from the teeth of time. (after J. Aubrey)

WiltsMuseum_Col
Posts: 19
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:00 pm

#3 Post by WiltsMuseum_Col »

Selwood is right, and for a local one you can actually walk: look for a deserted medieval village, a DMV, with good earthworks, where the documents show a fourteenth-century decline. There are several in the county on access land. I will message you a couple that are reachable and safe to visit, with permission noted. Take the lidar images from the other thread up with you and you will see the house platforms under your feet.
Record it, or it never happened.

young_jordan
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2016 5:00 pm

#4 Post by young_jordan »

thank you both!! the plague and the sheep together is a brilliant line, thats my opening sentence sorted. will go and walk one at half term and take photos. this forum is honestly better than the internet.
wansdyke got me an A, cheers all ;) now doing history at college

Post Reply